Tuesday, November 27, 2012

Interview Report: Algebraic Thinking

Due to some technical issues, I was not able to videotape the interview.



Background Information
            The student I interviewed is currently a 10th grader who is taking pre-calculus. Her name is Lisa and she is my cousin who lives in Oakland. From what I know about her, she has a really strong background in mathematics. Her pre-calculus teacher is Ms. Abernethy. I asked her the four questions on Page 37 on the Fostering Algebraic Thinking (FAT) book. For problem 3 & 4, I only went over a, b, c instead of all 5 parts with her because I thought that it was too redundant to ask her all the questions. However, the theory and activity remained the same to a certain extent. Due to some technical issues, I was not able to videotape the interview, but the interview lasted for about 30 minutes.

Algebraic Thinking
                According to Fostering Algebraic Thinking (FAT) by Driscoll (1999), “[people] characterize algebraic thinking as the ability to operate on an unknown quantity as if the quantity was known, in contrast to arithmetic reasoning which involves operations on known quantities (p. 1).  In other words, algebra thinking focused a lot about solving variables, but sometimes we cannot clearly define these variables. For example, solve for x, when the given function is x + 5 = 6. But, what does this really mean? This is when Algebra thinking steps in to help us think about the functions and how they work in our mind. To be more concise, no definition can fully define algebraic thinking because algebraic thinking can also be defined as generalizing through a given example, which is what we did for this interview report.
            If the student is building rules to represent the function, then this would be considered algebraic thinking because the student is forming their own conjectures to help him or her understand more about the problem. This is one of the key ideas in algebraic thinking, where students start to form patterns, make conjecture, and generalize the problem to help them comprehend the problem.
            The student used algebraic thinking when the student was discovering the patterns. The student told me that, “when you go in order, like from 1+2 to 2+3, the sum of the consecutive number jumps up by 2.” This showed me that the student had some sort of additive thinking in their mind when she was establishing the discoveries. Furthermore, this is a form of abstracting from computation because the student was generalizing using the relationships among addition.
            Furthermore, at the end of the interview, the student was also able to build rules to represent the given function. The student said, “see you can add 22+23 but by knowing the pattern of adding 3 consecutive numbers each time [it goes up by 3 each time], then you realize 45 can be made with 3 consecutive numbers too because 45 is a multiple of 3.” In the beginning of the interview, the student was not able to tell me about multiple of 3 for adding 3 consecutive numbers, but the student was able to develop a general rule for the problem at the end to help me confirm that the student has some sort of conceptual understanding in algebraic thinking.

Next Step
            As mentioned by Driscoll, students learn from three habits of mind: Doing-Undoing, building rules to represent functions, and abstracting from computation (p. 36). In order for students to do these thinking in their mind, the questions have to concise and clear, so that they can conceptualize the problem.
            A leading activity can be a group activity/investigation. Since we are currently learning consecutive numbers, I can ask the students to find the sum of the first 100 consecutive numbers without adding the 100 numbers by hand or calculator. I expect the students to make predictions with their group mates. Once they have some idea on how to do the problem, the students should then try to write a formula for this problem. The students are basically building rules to represent the given problem, and by doing so, the students are starting to see more patterns about consecutive numbers.

Reactions
            I learned that some of these questions can be really board. For example, Problem 2 stated, “For each number from 1 to 35, find all the ways to write it as a sum of two or more consecutive numbers? Explore and record three discoveries that can share with the class.” My student was just stating tons of patterns that may not be relevant to the problem. However, at the end of problem 4, the student was able to explain the pattern explicitly when the question was stated explicitly. The questions have to be clear in order for students to develop algebraic thinking with the given example.
            One thing that surprised me the most was that my student has a little trouble comprehending problem #1. I had to clarify it to her or ask her to reread the question in order for her to give me a good response. I found out that this interview was more abstract than the last interview we did. The proportional reasoning interview was straight forward, but in this interview, the student can form many conjectures or discoveries that are hard to use to measure their understanding of the content.


Works Cited
Mark Driscoll (1999). Fostering Algebraic Thinking: A Guide for Teachers Grades 6-10. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.

No comments:

Post a Comment