The Kieran’s article focused a lot
about the content of algebra. The author also mentions that if students have
troubles with the subject algebra taught by the teacher, then it is more likely
that the teacher taught out of the textbook. The textbook may be one of the
reasons why algebra can be really difficult for students to comprehend. Kieran
(1992) claimed, “Presently, the content of most algebra textbooks does not
incorporate a procedural-structural perspective on student learning of
mathematics; nor does it appear to reflect how algebra evolved historically”
(p, 274). The textbook usually teach the students how to procedurally compute problems,
but it does not help students’ gain conceptual understanding towards the
subject. Furthermore, the textbooks do not engage the students enough because
the textbook merely do not help the students develop more understandings.
Kieran also mentioned that algebra
problems can be written as word problems. There are also different types of
word problems, such as traditional word problems, open-ended, and problems
dealing with functions. In the algebra textbooks, traditional word problems can
often be seen (Kieran, 1992, p. 264). These traditional word problems can often
be really challenging for the students because of the word-based text.
Furthermore, one of the reasons that they can be confusing is that because these
traditional word problems focused on the textbook perspective. They are not
easy for students to understand it. Students are just procedurally computing
the answers when they see traditional word problems.
According to Fostering Algebraic
Thinking (FAT) by Driscoll (1999), “[people] characterize algebraic thinking as
the ability to operate on an unknown quantity as if the quantity was known, in
contrast to arithmetic reasoning which involves operations on known quantities
(p. 1). In other words, algebra thinking
focused a lot about solving variables, but sometimes we cannot clearly define
these variables. For example, solve for x,
when the given function is x + 5 = 6.
But, what does this really mean? This is when Algebra thinking steps in to help
us think about the functions and how they work in our mind.
To ensure that students understand
the content, the teacher has to spend more time teaching conceptually instead
of teaching procedurally. The teachers should not spend a lot of time doing traditional
word problems because they are procedural in a way. Instead, the teacher should
ask more open-ended questions to help engage the students in the topic and
content. Furthermore, instead of using textbooks to teach, the teacher can use
hands-on activities to engage the students. For example, the teacher can use
algebra tiles to teach students algebra. The long stick would represent the
variable x, and the small cubicle
tile would represent the integer 1. In this case, the students can use manipulative
to help them learn algebra, so that the students can have a picture in mind and
visualize the main concept of algebra.
By providing clear and accurate
directions and instructions, the students are more likely to grasp the content.
Furthermore, if the teacher tries to focus more on hands-on activities, then
the students will not have difficulty with traditional word problems that can be
found in textbooks. Hence, a good teacher can address the students’ common
difficulties by providing hands-on activities and proper scaffolds.
I understand what you are saying about word problems tending to be very procedural. However, i don't think that this means we should spend time teaching them. Word problems are one of the ways we connect math to real-world problems, and it is important for students to make connections between real situations and the math they are learning. But i do agree that there should be better ways to teach and incorporate word problems in fostering algebraic thinking. In my host class, for word problems we use a method called G.U.E.S.S. ( stands for Given, Unknown, Equation, Solution, and Sentence). For G.U. and the second S. Student are not just writing the numbers. They have to go further and actually write out what those number means. This allows students to put meaning behind their work, and tie it all to the real-life situation.
ReplyDelete